This study, which is determined by Nasser of Islamic Modernists; intercession, interest, women's heritage, the veil, unseen, surroundeth, short subject, cutting the hands of thieves, the claims of married zinakar subject to death by stoning; Holy books, the Qur'an, Sunnah, ijma, we tried to analyze the criticism in the framework of an eye. First of alleged Islamic punishment by Modernists in nature incompatible with human dignity and human rights principles, which include allegations of torture and cruel and it is given the answers to the allegations. The answer to these claims while trying to reach first-hand sources reaching the next source if we can not reach our aim of these resources critical response to these allegations bear the main purpose of our study. Within the framework of this study; intercession subject and interest subject to positive and negative critics on the issue with our critical response to the Modernists recent comments, she said, the provision of Modernist about the issues fines to evaluation within the historical framework, we try to answer in a critical way. We, at the entrance to this part of our study, the purpose and methods of the subject in the first section after explicit; modernism, hermeneutics, and We have discussed the basic idea of the modernist with a critical perspective. In the second part; The universality of the Qur'an, we should have studied how to understand and interpret. In the third section; intercede with the issues they claimed that the historical Modernist interest, women's hijab, women's heritage, to make women's unseen, surroundeth married adultery 's with our critical response to be stoning and the Modernist in the thief cut the subject of hand , they support their claims of Modernist Hz. Omar Is unfounded the claims of the application process and the Modernist Nasser, we have. Keywords: Adultery, Bear Witness, Heritage, Hermeneutic, Hijab, Historicity Intercession, Interest, Modernism, theft.